Replacement Theology is not the answer. In rightly dividing the word, we see the role for Israel and a role for the body of Christ. The prophecies of Israel will be fulfilled and the body of Christ will be taken into heaven as promised.

The King James Bible does not explicitly support replacement theology. God’s covenants with Israel, particularly the Abrahamic, are described as “everlasting,” and passages like Romans 11 affirm Israel’s ongoing role.

The King James Bible does not explicitly support replacement theology. God’s covenants with Israel, particularly the Abrahamic, are described as “everlasting,” and passages like Romans 11 affirm Israel’s ongoing role.

AI has done an excellent job of reading my mind. So far the only weakness in all that was said is about the church age.

AI has done an excellent job of reading my mind. So far the only weakness in all that was said is about the church age.

This has to with the church using replacement theology, not rightly dividing the word. I am experiencing this today. I attend a church that believes we are under the new covenant, and we are a part of the Jewish church

This has to with the church using replacement theology, not rightly dividing the word. I am experiencing this today. I attend a church that believes we are under the new covenant, and we are a part of the Jewish church